Connect with us


HollyFrontier: Making The Right Moves



I first made HollyFrontier Corporation (HFC) a Long Idea in July 2020 as part of my “See Through the Dip” thesis. Since then, the stock is up 10% compared to a 38% gain for the S&P 500. Despite underperforming the market, the stock could be worth $67+/share today – a 123%+ upside.

HollyFrontier’s Stock Has Strong Upside Based on:

  • long-term, growing global demand for petroleum products
  • recent acquisitions create more shareholder value
  • renewables and retail locations improving margins
  • the stock has 123% upside if profits return to pre-pandemic levels.

HollyFrontier currently earns an unattractive stock rating, but I remain bullish on the stock. My stock ratings are based on criteria that measure the quality of a business’ earnings and the valuation of its stock to assess the risk/reward of owning the stock. While my firm’s stock ratings are unbiased and beat the “Street”, there are times when additional analysis of a company will reveal risk or opportunity not captured in the rating. For example, with HollyFrontier, I think the dips in profitability in 2020 and 2021 that drove the company’s quality of a business’ earnings rating lower are likely temporary and will rebound to pre-pandemic levels. As a result, I believe the quality of a business’ earnings rating will improve, and, if so, then the stock’s rating would be attractive.

Furthermore, I believe the company’s recent acquisitions will drive its profitability above pre-pandemic levels. The recent decline in price provides a buying opportunity for investors who missed out earlier.

Figure 1: Long Idea Performance: From Date of Publication Through 3/1/2022


What’s Working

Long-Term Global Demand for Petroleum: HollyFrontier operates in an industry that is critical to the global economy. As such, demand for its products will grow for decades to come even as countries strive toward net zero goals. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects global energy consumption to rise from 2020 levels through 2050 in all five of its Energy Outlook cases.

Acquisitions Create Shareholder Value: HollyFrontier ties its executive compensation (cash and performance share units) to return on capital employed (ROCE) targets. ROCE is similar to return on invested capital (ROIC) and there is a strong correlation between improving ROIC and increasing shareholder value.

This alignment of incentives is especially important considering HollyFrontier’s completed acquisition of Puget Sound from Shell, PLC (SHEL) and announced acquisition of Sinclair Oil Corporation in 2021. The combined value of these deals is ~$2.3 billion, or 47% of HollyFrontier’s market cap. Upon completion, HollyFrontier will be named HF Sinclair.

Per Figure 2, I estimate[1] these acquisitions will contribute ~$400 million of additional annual NOPAT. Based on their purchase prices and estimated annual NOPATs, the implied ROICs for the Puget Sound acquisition and Sinclair merger are 21% and 16%, respectively. The implied ROIC on each of these deals is above HollyFrontier’s 5-year average ROIC of 6%. Acquisitions that improve ROIC are very rare and can create significant value for shareholders in the unusual cases where they occur.

Figure 2: Expected ROIC from Puget Sound and Sinclair Acquisitions ($ millions)

Retail Arm Boosts Margins: Included with the Sinclair acquisition is over 300 distributors and 1,500 branded retail locations. By integrating into a branded wholesale network, the refinery gains a consistent sales channel with more stable margins.

Renewables Business Satisfies RIN Requirements: Sinclair blends fuel that qualifies for renewable identification number (RIN) credits. Acquisition of Sinclair provides HollyFrontier with a larger and more mature renewable diesel operation.

The benefits of the acquisition are that renewables can transition from a regulatory challenge to a profit growth driver for HollyFrontier. HollyFrontier completed its conversion of its Cheyenne facility that will have a 6,000 BPD renewable diesel capacity. The company expects its Artesia renewable diesel unit to be operational in 2Q22. Combined, HollyFrontier expects these facilities to produce 200 million gallons of renewable diesel annually. The added experience from Sinclair’s renewables business will help the company grow this new operating segment. The EIA projects renewables will grow from ~90 quadrillion British thermal units (qbtu) in 2020 to ~240 qbtu in 2050, or a 167% increase.

What’s Not Working

Off to a Rocky Start With Puget Sound: HollyFrontier completed its acquisition of Puget Sound on November 1, 2021. The pipeline, which supplies Puget Sound, was shut down for three weeks in November due to widespread flooding and mudslides, and bad weather damaged a hydrocracker unit, which necessitated major maintenance.

The early troubles with the Puget Sound refinery resulted in lower-than-expected crude throughput of 421,000 BPD, or 8% below its midpoint guidance of 460,000 BPD in 4Q21. However, even with problems at Puget Sound, the company’s 4Q21 crude throughput was 1.1x greater than 4Q20 and 1.2x greater than 4Q19. While the weather-related problems in Puget Sound affected the beginning of 1Q22, the problem is now resolved.

Declining Demand in the U.S.: S&P Global Platts expects U.S. gasoline demand to peak in 2023, which means the U.S. refiners could have difficulty growing operations domestically. However, much like with Phillips 66, even with less demand in the U.S., increased global demand will keep complex U.S. refineries in demand well beyond 2023. A decline in demand will likely result in some refinery closures by other firms, but I expect the decline of weaker competitors to create market openings for owners of complex refiners, such as HollyFrontier.

Refining rationalization is already underway, and 2021 was the first year, in at least 30, where more global refining capacity was removed than added. While demand for fuels to move people and goods is rising rapidly across the globe, capacity is shrinking.

Stock Is Priced for Profits to Remain Far Below Pre-Acquisition Levels

Despite increasing its refining capacity by 67% with its recent acquisitions, HollyFrontier’s stock is priced as if profits will permanently drop below pre-acquisition levels. Below, I use my reverse discounted cash flow (DCF) model to analyze the expectations for future growth in cash flows baked into a couple of stock price scenarios for HollyFrontier.

In the first scenario, I assume HollyFrontier’s:

  • NOPAT margin rises to 4% (five-year average vs. 2% in 2021) from 2022 – 2031, and
  • revenue grows by 37% in 2022 and 9% in 2023 with increased capacity from Puget Sound and Sinclair (equal to consensus), and
  • revenue falls by 3% compounded annually from 2024 – 2031.

In this scenario, HollyFrontier’s NOPAT in 2031 is just $859 million, and the stock is worth $30/share today – equal to the current price. In this scenario, HollyFrontier’s NOPAT in 2031 is 11% below its average pre-pandemic NOPAT from 2011 to 2019 of $969 million.

Shares Could Reach $67 or Higher

If I assume HollyFrontier’s:

  • NOPAT margin rises to 5% (all-time average) in 2022 – 2031,
  • revenue grows by 37% in 2022 and 9% in 2023 with increased capacity from Puget Sound and Sinclair, and
  • revenue grows by just 1% compounded annually from 2024 – 2031, then

the stock is worth $67/share today – 123% above the current price. In this scenario, HollyFrontier’s NOPAT in 2031 is still 2% below 2018 levels. Should HollyFrontier’s NOPAT reach new highs with its increased capacity, the stock has even more upside.

Figure 3: HollyFrontier’s Historical and Implied NOPAT: DCF Valuation Scenarios

Disclosure: Matt Shuler owns HFC. David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Matt Shuler receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, style, or theme.

[1] I estimate the expected NOPAT by applying a 0.64 multiple to the company’s estimated mid-cycle Puget Sound and Sinclair EBITDAs. HollyFrontier’s pre-pandemic NOPAT to EBITDA multiple from 2015 – 2019 = 0.64.


Will There Be War Over Taiwan – The Next Spy Thriller



I usually go through a rhythm of reading one or two serious books, followed by a few works of fiction and with summer on the way I wanted to highlight a few of both. In that regard I have just finished Laurence Durrell’s ‘White Eagles in Serbia’, an old-fashioned espionage thriller where the hero Colonel Methuen is dropped behind enemy lines in post war Serbia (he speaks excellent Serbo-Croat) and becomes embroiled in a violent plot to overthrow Tito.

The book is a warm-up to reading Durrell’s ‘The Alexandria Quartet’, a work that nearly won him the Nobel Prize. Durrell was part of an interesting Anglo-Irish family, who largely considered themselves Indian – his brother Gerald, the naturalist and writer, touches on this in ‘My Family and Other Animals’.


Though I am not an expert on these matters, I found ‘White Eagles’ a more realistic account of espionage than much of what we see in the media today (Mick Herron’s ‘Slow Horses’ is good), and overall it is a tale of derring-do that is more in keeping with the work of the founding fathers of the genre – Eric Ambler, John Buchan, Erskine Childers and Ted Allebury for example.

It also made opportune reading given what seems to be an epidemic of espionage – with reports of the Chinese hacking group APT40 using graduates to infiltrate Western corporates and notably the admission by the head of Switzerland’s intelligence that Russian espionage is rife in that country (notably in Geneva – for which readers should consult Somerset Maugham’s ‘Ashenden’ as background material).

These and other trends – such as the outbreak of a heavy cyber battle last week (against Lithuania and Norway for instance) and the increasingly public ‘clandestine’ war between Israel and Iran (they have just sacked their spy chief) point to a world that is ever more contested and complex.


Secret World

One of the new trends in the space is cyber espionage – both in the sense of stealing state and industrial/corporate secrets, influencing actors (such as the manipulation of the 2016 US Presidential election) and outright acts of hostility such as the hacking of public databases and utilities (i.e. healthcare systems). Here, if readers are looking for some serious literature I can recommend two excellent books – Nicole Perlroth’s ‘This is how they tell me the world ends’ and ‘Secret World’ by Christopher Andrew.

I am personally more intrigued by the difference between a spy and a strategist. A spy’s work could well be described as the pursuit of information about someone who is acting with a specific intent, as well as a sense of their reaction function. There are plenty of examples – from Christine Joncourt (‘La Putain de la Republique’) to Richard Sorge (see Owen Matthews’ ‘An Impeccable Spy’).

In contrast a strategist may try to plot trends and the opportunities, spillovers and damage they may cause. The US National Intelligence department is good in this regard, becoming the first major intelligence agency to publish detailed warnings on the side effects of climate damage.

Spies and strategists might work together, but history is full of examples (LC Moyzisch’s ‘Operation Cicero’) where intelligence fails to make it through the strategic process or is simply ignored for political reasons (might the early warnings on the invasion of Ukraine be an example).

Asia next?

In the spirit of the Durrells and Flemings of the world, what issues might be of interest in terms of digging into unknown knowns and unknown unknowns. Here are a few ideas, most of which are Asia focused (we might see an uptick in Asia focused thrillers).

On the diplomatic front, an interesting recent development was the visit of Indonesian president Joko Widodo to Ukraine, and then Moscow. It was a rare visit to Ukraine by an Asian leader and potentially marks the emergence or at least aspiration of Indonesia (population 273 million) as an emerging world diplomatic player. What has intrigued me so far is that there has been little coordination by the populous emerging (largely Muslim) nations (Nigeria, Indonesia, Pakistan) in the face of high energy and food prices, and that potentially Widodo could play a unifying role here.

Then, still in Asia, but on a more deadly footing, if the Western commentariat is to be believed, China is preparing an assault on Taiwan, and looking to learn from Russia’s military errors in this regard. Other countries are reacting, and I suspect that there will be much intrigue around Taiwan’s ability to acquire sufficiently powerful ballistic missiles that could strike the coastal cities of China, and relatedly how long might it take Japan to produce nuclear missiles (my sources say they could very ambitiously do it in five months!).

So, whilst the espionage literature of the 20th century has tended to be focused on Geneva, Berlin and London in the 21st century we may find ourselves reading about ‘behind the lines’ exploits in Jakarta and Tanegashima.

Continue Reading


Crypto Minsky Moment Now Happening



During the second half of the twentieth century, economist Hyman Minsky provided a set of guidelines to identify what makes financial markets fragile and economies unstable. It is the midpoint of 2022, and a crypto Minsky moment is underway.

Investment professional Paul McCulley coined the term “Minsky moment.” He did so when describing the dynamics of an earlier financial crisis, the Asian Debt Crisis of 1997.

Minsky actually died in 1995, and so was not alive either to witness for the 1997 Asian currency crisis, or to see his name used in a catchphrase for economic instability. Nevertheless, the term “Minsky moment” has stuck.

Here are three facets of the crypto Minsky moment that is ongoing.

1. At the beginning of 2022, Bitcoin BTC was trading at $47,743, and closed on June 30 at $19,986, down 58%. The market value of Bitcoin comprises the lion’s share of the entire crypto-market; therefore, as the value of Bitcoin goes, so goes the value of the entire crypto asset class.

2. Hedge funds are shorting shares of Tether USDT , a stablecoin that is not so stable and beginning to wobble. Notably, Tether is the major “coin of the realm” for the inter-crypto market, the exchange of one crypto-asset for another. Another stablecoin, TerraUSD, did worse than wobble: it collapsed in May.

3. The crypto-lender Celsius is now fighting for its life.


In February 2022, Bitcoin was trading in the neighborhood of $44,000. At that time, I warned that crypto-investors needed to pay attention to how the issues Minsky studied applied to cryptocurrency markets. Now that these markets are experiencing a Minsky moment, let me just recapitulate in hindsight what I warned about in foresight.

Minsky’s framework features about a dozen major components. Below are six that just leap out.

1. Fringe finance: This was the term Minsky applied to what Paul McCulley — and now the rest of us — call “shadow banking.” Shadow banks are financial institutions that operate outside the central banking system, and do not have the central bank as their lender of last resort. Crypto-markets are a perfect example of fringe finance, as they operate at the fringe of the global financial system.

2. Speculative and Ponzi finance: Minsky warned about debt finance in which the source of the funds for making interest payments and repaying principal is price appreciation rather than cash. Prudent debt finance, Minsky was very clear to say, is based on hedge finance, where cash generation, not price appreciation, provides the funds for borrowers to fulfill their obligations to lenders.

Minksy warned, very loudly, that when market participants are gripped by euphoria, they shift from hedge finance to speculative and Ponzi finance. The stability issues associated with Tether and TerraUSD UST stem from the riskiness of the portfolios which back the stablecoins they offer, or in the case of TerraUSD offered. The concern is that these portfolios are weighted towards speculative and Ponzi finance. In 2021, a group of entities including Tether reached an $18.5 million settlement with the office of New York States attorney general. The office had accused these market entities of making several public misrepresentations regarding the dollar reserves which back them, especially the Tether stablecoin.

3. Asset pricing bubbles associated with financial innovation: Those wondering what an asset pricing bubble looks like need only look at Bitcoin’s history. Those wondering what financial innovation looks like, need only look at how DeFi has evolved to produce assets like Tether and lending institutions like Celsius.

4. Excessive leverage: Celsius has an assets-to-equity ratio of 19-to-1, much higher than 9-to-1 for the average North American bank in the S&P 1500 Composite index. Assets-to-equity is a standard ratio measuring leverage: the higher the ratio, the higher the leverage.

5. Bank runs, beginning with the commercial paper market: Tether is concerned about a run on its stablecoin, as investors rush to sell their Tether coins en masse. There are rumors that the assets backing Tether include highly risk commercial paper issued by Chinese entities. Tether denies the rumors, but that has not stopped hedge funds who are shorting the Tether to express their concerns that this is the case.

6. Too big to fail: Minsky asserted that during a financial crisis, governments would engage in what he called “contingency socialism” and rescue firms that are too big to fail. At this stage, there appear to be no firms large enough to qualify as too big to fail. TerraUSD certainly did not so qualify.

I am not saying that cryptocurrencies have no fundamental value, and in fact I believe that they do. Economists call the concept “value in use,” which they contrast with “value in exchange.” The problem is that there has been a large gap between crypto value in use and “crypto over-value in exchange.”

Crypto investors might believe that they are making bets on crypto-fundamentals; and indeed they might be doing so, to a small extent. The thing is to a large extent, most of what they are betting on is sentiment. Minksy warned that euphoria will surge during economic expansion, at least until the Fed raises interest rates to address inflation. Then investors’ sense of euphoria collapses, and with it asset prices.

As Yogi Berra once said, and might have said again in connection with Minsky’s perspective and crypto markets: It’s deja vu all over again.

Crypto euphoria is in a state of collapse, which is why crypto markets are experiencing a Minsky moment. Down the line, a crypto phoenix will rise out of the ashes, with less euphoria, similar to the way that the dot-com sector emerged from the dot-com bubble. Until then, investors of all stripes would do well to pay attention to what Minsky taught.

Continue Reading


Stock Market Investors: Don’t Fear Inflation – Embrace It



The inflationary trend is now self-perpetuating, but that doesn’t mean investors cannot earn excellent returns.

Start with today’s inflation:

The three underlying causes are:

  1. Too much money
  2. Too low interest rates
  3. Inflationary actions/reactions being taken by businesses, other organizations, employees, consumers, investors and Wall Street

Number 3 is the reason an inflationary trend is so hard to stop. It’s a chain effect of “sellers” pushing prices up at least in line with cost increases and “buyers” attempting to hold back the inevitable.

Therefore, don’t expect this Fed to subdue inflation with a “soft” landing. Inflation well above the Fed’s 2% target likely is here to stay and even increase until the Federal Reserve and political leaders accept the need to take drastic, unsavory actions.

Okay, that sounds dire and distressing. So, where does the happy investor part come in?

How investors can win from the inflationary growth periods


Remember, inflation is rising prices. On the surface, that means company revenues and earnings get an inflationary boost, producing stock price gains for investors.

However, industries and companies get affected differently. Therefore, succeeding in the coming inflationary bull market means adjusting strategies and expectations for the altered environment.

How to adjust strategies and expectations

The conditions to understand and accept are:

Inflation – Expect a rising cycle of higher highs and higher lows as organizations and consumers get into the swing of it

Interest rates – Realize they are still well below the level capital markets would set without Federal Reserve interference. So, consider this a bonus inflationary period where the Fed says it is tightening, but it actually is only reducing the loosening already in place. In other words, there is a long way to go before conditions truly get tight.

Economic growth – Until there is a recession, “real” (inflation-adjusted) GDP growth will remain positive. That means “nominal” (not inflation-adjusted) growth will be increasing at a higher clip as prices rise.

Company growth – Here is where things get interesting. An inflationary environment creates winners and laggards. Therefore, do not expect yesterday’s winners to be tomorrow’s in this new environment. Most likely, a significant shift will occur. And that brings us to…

Company stocks – As the financial, economy and business conditions transform, so, too, will Wall Street. Expect to see new strategies, selections and valuations based on inflation-based rationale. And that means the biggest change ahead is probably…

The shift to actively-managed funds from index funds

The inflationary growth period will push “outperformance” to the top of investors’ wish lists. No longer will matching the whole market’s middle-of-the-road results be satisfactory. As active managers charge ahead, investors will begin jumping aboard.

Skeptical? Don’t be. The combination of new, different and outperformance will be like meat to today’s malnourished investors. It’s a bull market cycle driven by extraordinary conditions that will replace the worry refrain of inflation-interest-and-recession (Oh, my!)

Note: Like many stock market periods, the reasons and results come from a combination of conditions and actions – not one simple explanation. Therefore, be sure to read my previous article, “Exceptionally Good Conditions For Stock Bull Market Launch In July.” In it I list four actively managed funds in which I have invested.

MORE FROM FORBESExceptionally Good Conditions For Stock Bull Market Launch In July

The bottom line: Multiple conditions build inflation trends, so ignore simplistic commentaries

Many (most?) media reports link simple explanations to results. Ignore them. They are written by reporters on a deadline with no time for analysis. Just think back to the gyrating explanations for each daily (or intraday) stock market move. The reason cited is normally a coincidental occurrence. For example, “8.6% inflation!” Or, “Consumer sentiment at a new low!” Or, when a simple reason is lacking, something like this from The Wall Street Journal (June 27) – (Underlining is mine)

“U.S. stocks slumped Tuesday, giving up early gains and falling for a second consecutive day as investors parsed fresh economic figures for clues about the pace of monetary-policy tightening.”

No, the market didn’t fall because investors were parsing for clues about anything. In fact, most short-term market moves are noise, often reversed a day or two later. A better short-term period to watch is a week, because the weekend market closure has day traders sitting on their cash.

Instead, follow economic, business and financial developments without trying to tie each to a stock market move. A beneficial approach for linking everything together is quarterly analysis. Why wait three months? Because each quarter contains all the earnings reports (and management outlooks), followed by the quarter-end reporting and analysis from active managers. Moreover, examining a trend quarter-by-quarter does away with all the in-between gyrations that can produce more uncertainty than understanding.

Continue Reading